Court in the Jayalalithaa disproportionate assets case and “restored in full” DA case verdict shows that the corrupt cannot escape from law. The Supreme Court verdict in the disproportionate assets case should The DVAC, thanks to former Chief Minister Jayalalithaa’s hostility, was. SC verdict accuses Jayalalithaa as a mastermind who misused her public Highlighting that the Jayalalithaa disporportionate assets case.

Author: Mit Daibar
Country: Antigua & Barbuda
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 19 October 2017
Pages: 251
PDF File Size: 8.38 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.25 Mb
ISBN: 527-2-48312-395-8
Downloads: 70621
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vum

The Times of India. However, it required enormous guts to launch raids at appropriate and aswets most unlikely of places, pick up valuable evidence, and preserve it assiduously for a clinical analysis. Foul language Slanderous Judgemsnt hatred against a certain community Others. It does appear that the new public prosecutor is hand in glove with the accused, thereby causing a reasonable apprehension of likelihood of failure of justice in the minds of the public at large.

The court said Jayalalithaa “knew fully well that Sasikala would be dealing with her funds credited to her account in Jaya Publications”. Singh moves Karnataka HC challenging the special court order imposing cost.

The immediate fallout could be that the Governor of Tamil Nadu may want to wait for the Supreme Court judgment before swearing Sasikala in. Supreme Court granted bail to Jayalalithaa and the other three in There is a strong indication that the process of justice is being subverted.

Another follower tried self-immolation in front of jzyalalithaa house of Jayalalithaa at Poes Gardens but was stopped by the police. Special Court defers by a week to September 27 the pronouncement of its verdict. Thursday 27 DecemberAn Ignored Tragedy: By Augustprosecution witnesses examined and only 10 more remained.

Disproportionate assets case against Jayalalithaa – Wikipedia

Bail plea was not accepted, and is postponed for six more days”. This landmark Supreme Court judgment will be in vain otherwise. SC commences final hearing on the appeals against Jayalalithaa’s acquittal. How the DA case verdict went against Sasikala: Requests for a VVIP cell and medical treatment were denied. But his soul would be delighted that he did not labour in vain. Anyway, the court said it was “inessential” to delve deep into this aspect considering the “pregnant evidence on record, unassailably proving the disproportionateness of the assets as contemplated in Section 13 1 e of the Prevention of Corruption Act of “.


However, though in the process of scrutiny of the facts and the law involved and the inextricable nexus of A1 with A2 to A4, reference to her role as well as the evidence pertaining to her had been made, she having expired meanwhile, the appeals, so far as those relate to her stand abated. The Court stated that the evidence led to the conclusion that the accused A1-A4 Jayalalithaa, Sasikala, Sudhakaran and Ilavarasi had entered into a conspiracy, and Jayalalithaa had amassed assets disproportionate to her income which she had dispersed among the others.

Eight days of suspense over. The Court further pointed out a variety of circumstances in the case that proved the existence of a conspiracy among the accused.

DA Case: Sasikala And Others Guilty, SC Restores Trial Court Verdict [Read Judgment]

SC rejects Bhawani Singh’s appointment as “bad in judgemfnt, says case does not warrant de novo fresh hearing of appeals. It required extraordinary ingenuity on the part of the appellate court to turn casw such a solid case.

That in turn would mean that special court judge Justice Cunha’s judgment, convicting Sasikala, is restored. Jayalalithaa files bail plea in Karnataka HC”. The case had political implications as it was the first case where a ruling Chief minister had to step down on account of a court verdict. Bangalore Special Court noted jayalallthaa “No attempt has been made to elicit or find out whether witnesses were resiling because they are now under pressure to do so.

February 15, Madras High Court dismisses 3 petitions jayallalithaa Jayalalithaa including one challenging the sanction granted by then Governor M Fathima Beevi for prosecuting her.

Please Email the Editor. Judge says SPP had filed it only with the purpose of delaying the proceedings. Skip to main content. Watch the video here. Sasikala, of hatching one criminal conspiracy after other at Poes Garden to launder the ill-gotten wealth of Jayalalithaa for purchasing huge properties in the names of “masked fronts.


This article is closed for comments.

Skip to main content. As examples of the trial court’s reasonableness in appreciating the evidence, the Supreme Court pointed how Judge Cunha had excluded a sum of Rs. Sudhakaran—and sentenced them to four years’ simple imprisonment.

I still recall fondly the assistance rendered to me by a remarkably clued-in and honest legal adviser who burnt the midnight oil to prepare a solid case to be presented to the trial court. It is public opinion that should assert itself now on. Jayalalithaa ceases to be CM. The court convicted Jayalalithaa, Sasikala and the others under charges of illegal property acquisition.

Karnataka government accepts his resignation in January, and discharges him from the case. Jayalalithaa filed a bail plea in the Karnataka High Court but it was rejected. Special Court imposes jayalaalithaa cost of one-day salary on SPP Bhavani Singh for not resuming final arguments citing ill-health.

Subramanian Swamy, then Janata Party chief, files a case against Jayalalithaa alleging that during her tenure as Tamil Nadu Chief Minister from toshe amassed properties worth Rs It was stipulated that the appeal must be completed within three months. But from all accounts he stood up to enormous threats and intimidation. Stating that the evidence of existence of disproportionate assets is unassailable, the Supreme Court said that there was jayalaithaa need for itself to make any independent calculations as the Karnataka High Court had done when acquitting late CM Jayalalithaa and Sasikala in Elavarasi for amassing wealth disproportionate to their income when Jayalalithaa was chief minister of Tamil Nadu between and February 14, The I-T Dept estimated the wedding cost at Rs 10 crore.